Friday, October 26, 2007

Who is a worse liar? Neena Vyas or Harsih Khare

Neena Vyas and Harish Khare are back with a bang. Even if you use an electron microscope, you will not find a trace of objectivity in their writing. I don't take them seriously and believe most other do not as well. However, the contradiction in their reports(yesterday) was too stark to be missed.

On the front page Neena Vyas wrote that the Left is not an 'ally', but a supporting party.

Some senior leaders said that it would be in the party’s interest to allow a discussion as it would clearly bring out the fact that the United Progressive Alliance did not have the backing of even its allies, not to speak of the supporting parties

http://www.hindu.com/2007/10/25/stories/2007102562190100.htm

In the opinion pages,Harish Khare commented that

The UPA-Left cooperative equation was premised on an assumption of a convergence of the political (and electoral) interests among the partners, beyond the
anti-BJP instincts.

http://www.hindu.com/2007/10/25/stories/2007102554401000.htm

How come the 'supporting parties ' suddenly became 'Partners' 'beyond political and electoral interests'.

There is no point in asking who is lying- both are. Who is lying more?

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

"The UPA-Left cooperative equation was premised on an assumption of a convergence of the political (and electoral) interests among the partners...". Oh boy, that's a mouthful and heavy stuff. If there is covergence, identity of opinions etc. etc. then why have so many parties and a combine? It is just enough to have a single party with a nice name such as PSP (Praja Secular Party or better, Pseudo Secular Party) given that secularism seems to be the overriding concern of most of our political parties and their drum beaters such as Chindu.