Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Subscribe To
Posts
Comments
Blog List
-
-
Excerpts “The Sati Strategy” – Koenraad Elst - Related Posts: A rebuttal to Abul Kasem – “Women in Hinduism” by R Maliger and “Women in Hinduism” – Part II The post Excerpts “The Sati Strategy” – Koen...1 year ago
-
Swalpa controversy - Four panelists and a protest. A couple of weeks after the Modi government revoked the special status of Jammu & Kashmir, V Ravichandar, honorary director o...5 years ago
-
Mizuya Milk Tea Drink Mix Philippines Reviews - Mizuya Milk Tea Drink Mix is an amazing drink combination and one of the most nutritious drinks ever produced. It’s made using a combination of milk and ...6 years ago
-
Don't let the Uniform Civil Code scuttle triple talaq reform - By Swapan Dasgupta Much more than the cross-LoC raids on terrorist staging posts, the winter session of Parliament is likely to be dominated by the content...8 years ago
-
Get India going, don’t worry about Hindi - We really don’t need tax-funded babus to promote Hindi or protect India’s official language from Macaulay Putras. What we need is to focus on getting India...10 years ago
-
CHINESE PRIME MINISTER'S VISIT TO INDIA - B.RAMAN Prime Minister Li Kequiang of China, who took over in March last, is to visit India, Pakistan, Switzerland and Germany during his first rou...11 years ago
-
മാതൃഭൂമിയിലെ “ഹിന്ദു അജണ്ട”! - ഇവിടെപ്പറയുന്ന കാര്യങ്ങൾക്ക് ബാബാ രാംദേവിന്റെ സമരവുമായി യാതൊരു ബന്ധവുമില്ല. മാതൃഭൂമി ദിനപത്രത്തിൽ കഴിഞ്ഞദിവസം പ്രസിദ്ധീകരിച്ച ഒരു റിപ്പോർട്ടിലെ പ്രകടമാ...13 years ago
-
-
12 comments:
Good riddance, imho, we would have ended up supporting despotic muslim regimes all over the globe and vetoed anything against them for petty vote bank politics.
China is very grateful for that decision - they glorify idiotic stupid Nehru for his lovely decision. and they are returning their favor by supporting pakistan, by encroaching into Leh illegally and claiming arunachal pradesh and many more good things. they are the most gratefull conutry in the universe. we should all thank nehru for this.
thanks china for treating India this way. please continue to do so.
China is very grateful for that decision - they glorify idiotic stupid Nehru for his lovely decision. and they are returning their favor by supporting pakistan, by encroaching into Leh illegally and claiming arunachal pradesh and many more good things. they are the most gratefull conutry in the universe. we should all thank nehru for this.
thanks china for treating India this way. please continue to do so.
china is very grateful to nehru for his lovely decision to refuse India's permanent membership in UNSC. they are returning that favour by all means. indian people should thank the wonderful nehru for their life. nehru you are one of the wonders of the universe, the light of china........ where are you the great of greats.....
Please read "Are we Deceiving Ourselves Again?" by Arun Shourie: what is revealed is gripping and shocking.Foolishness, naievete, idiotic idealism, complete abnegation of reality......one runs out of adjectives.
We have yet to recover our kshatra dharma: uprightness combined with resolute fearlessness and statecraft.
Noorani had an article in Frontline sometime ago where he described Mao's contemptuous view of Nehru. Looking back at the 1950s, Nehru's naivete comes across remarkably.
http://koenraadelst.blogspot.com/2010/11/guha-vs-elst.html
Elst rebukes Guha for his letter in Hindu. Must read.
LiC declares month long celebrations:
Hu Jintao has been named the most powerful person in the world by Forbes, ahead of Obama
Seeing all the comments about your Founding Father Nehru, I think it is only fair to put the fact across.
The five permanent members (also known as the P5 or Big 5) of the UNSC were drawn from the victorious powers of World War II, and at the UN's founding in 1946. The issue of support was over whether ROC (Taiwan, supported by US, UK, France etc) or PRC (supported by USSR) was to be given the seat instead.
It is very simplistic (and erroneous) for the article to state otherwise, and to give the impression that India was to be given the UNSC Permanent seat on a platter.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UN_General_Assembly_Resolution_2758
A father who organized a support group for other parents whose children were sickened in one of China's worst food safety scandals was convicted and sentenced to 2 1/2 years in prison for inciting social disorder
Thanks Anonymous. You alleviated my pain atleast a little bit.
I could have never come to grips with that sort of thing...
So let me now move and mourn about so many other nasty things that "our Founding Father Nehru" (where did you get that mate?) did.
Hi, as referenced below (WIKI):
India
----
Mahatma Gandhi (1869–1948) is often referred to as the founding father of India. He was one of the top leaders of the Indian National Congress which struggled for the liberation of India from British rule.
Jawaharlal Nehru (1889–1964), the first Prime Minister of India and Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, India's First Deputy Prime Minister, are also considered as founding fathers.[21] It also refers to Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar (1891–1956), the architect of the Indian constitution, also an educationist, prominent political figure and India's first law minister.
Indian constitution provided constitutional guarantees and protections for a wide range of civil liberties for individual citizens, including freedom of religion, the abolition of untouchability and the outlawing of all forms of discrimination. Ambedkar argued for extensive economic and social rights for yong boy.
The Constitution was adopted on August 9, 1949 by the Constituent Assembly.
Although this usage is declining, when used in the plural, as the "Founding fathers" it usually refers to the members of the Constitutional Assembly's Draft Committee. Ironically the Drafting Committee also included women among its ranks.
Another interesting link:
http://www.hindu.com/2005/09/28/stories/2005092800270900.htm
Dated September 28, 1955. UN seat: Nehru clarifies:
Prime Minister Nehru has categorically denied any offer, formal or informal, having been received about a seat for India in the UN Security Council.
He made this statement in reply to a short notice question in the Lok Sabha on September 27 by Dr. J.N. Parekh whether India had refused a seat informally offered to her in the Security Council.
The Prime Minister said: "There has been no offer, formal or informal, of this kind. Some vague references have appeared in the press about it which have no foundation in fact. The composition of the Security Council is prescribed by the UN Charter, according to which certain specified nations have permanent seats. No change or addition can be made to this without an amendment of the Charter.
There is, therefore, no question of a seat being offered and India declining it. Our declared policy is to support the admission of all nations qualified for UN membership.''
On a side note, I personally believed had India been a 'Nation' after WWII in 1945, there would be a P6 with India being part of the UNSC.
Alas, this was not meant to be as It was still part of the British empire at that time.
Post a Comment