On the front page Neena Vyas wrote that the Left is not an 'ally', but a supporting party.
Some senior leaders said that it would be in the party’s interest to allow a discussion as it would clearly bring out the fact that the United Progressive Alliance did not have the backing of even its allies, not to speak of the supporting parties
http://www.hindu.com/2007/10/25/stories/2007102562190100.htm
In the opinion pages,Harish Khare commented that
The UPA-Left cooperative equation was premised on an assumption of a convergence of the political (and electoral) interests among the partners, beyond the
anti-BJP instincts.
http://www.hindu.com/2007/10/25/stories/2007102554401000.htm
How come the 'supporting parties ' suddenly became 'Partners' 'beyond political and electoral interests'.
There is no point in asking who is lying- both are. Who is lying more?
Posts
1 comment:
"The UPA-Left cooperative equation was premised on an assumption of a convergence of the political (and electoral) interests among the partners...". Oh boy, that's a mouthful and heavy stuff. If there is covergence, identity of opinions etc. etc. then why have so many parties and a combine? It is just enough to have a single party with a nice name such as PSP (Praja Secular Party or better, Pseudo Secular Party) given that secularism seems to be the overriding concern of most of our political parties and their drum beaters such as Chindu.
Post a Comment