Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Subscribe To
Posts
Comments
Blog List
-
-
Excerpts “The Sati Strategy” – Koenraad Elst - Related Posts: A rebuttal to Abul Kasem – “Women in Hinduism” by R Maliger and “Women in Hinduism” – Part II The post Excerpts “The Sati Strategy” – Koen...1 year ago
-
Swalpa controversy - Four panelists and a protest. A couple of weeks after the Modi government revoked the special status of Jammu & Kashmir, V Ravichandar, honorary director o...5 years ago
-
Mizuya Milk Tea Drink Mix Philippines Reviews - Mizuya Milk Tea Drink Mix is an amazing drink combination and one of the most nutritious drinks ever produced. It’s made using a combination of milk and ...6 years ago
-
Don't let the Uniform Civil Code scuttle triple talaq reform - By Swapan Dasgupta Much more than the cross-LoC raids on terrorist staging posts, the winter session of Parliament is likely to be dominated by the content...8 years ago
-
Get India going, don’t worry about Hindi - We really don’t need tax-funded babus to promote Hindi or protect India’s official language from Macaulay Putras. What we need is to focus on getting India...10 years ago
-
CHINESE PRIME MINISTER'S VISIT TO INDIA - B.RAMAN Prime Minister Li Kequiang of China, who took over in March last, is to visit India, Pakistan, Switzerland and Germany during his first rou...11 years ago
-
മാതൃഭൂമിയിലെ “ഹിന്ദു അജണ്ട”! - ഇവിടെപ്പറയുന്ന കാര്യങ്ങൾക്ക് ബാബാ രാംദേവിന്റെ സമരവുമായി യാതൊരു ബന്ധവുമില്ല. മാതൃഭൂമി ദിനപത്രത്തിൽ കഴിഞ്ഞദിവസം പ്രസിദ്ധീകരിച്ച ഒരു റിപ്പോർട്ടിലെ പ്രകടമാ...13 years ago
-
-
4 comments:
Apparently, Ram Madhav's clarification is missing even in today's edition. Did he copy the Reader's Editor?
XR,
Only he can answer that. But since it was an official letter representing the organization, it could have been published as a news item if the Editor so desired. Even if it is copied to the readers' editor, the email is first forwarded to the author - in this case Bhadrakumar - and only if he accepts the error and authorizes publication, a clarification is issued (at least it used to be this way with the earlier readers' editor and I suspect it works the same way even now). Authors are of course under no obligation to respond; so the matter may have died at any one of several places.
hahahahahaha... I just read the news item ... this "MoU" is nothing but a joke! The Congress and the Communist Party of China will put in place a mechanism to discuss and consult on bilateral and international events!
I am just not able to stop laughing... so did the two parties sit and discuss about recession? Or maybe terrorim? Wait, let's get closer to home, did they talk about Pakistan, Tibet, Arunachal Pradesh, Incursions?
Or maybe they signed this MoU so that the prince Rahul Gandhi will get to understand how the Chinese mind works... part of his grooming process?
- Sudhir
PS: It still beats me though - how the author/editor can turn a blind eye to such a clarification...
India has more enemies inside it's
territory than outside.These elements
in the country are more dangerous
than those operating from pakistan and china..
Post a Comment