tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32317349.post987710571109268281..comments2024-01-06T03:07:18.023-08:00Comments on The Chindu: Is the Government to Blame for the Current Crisis in Kashmir?Hindu Fundamentalisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15731102238577129533noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32317349.post-46156921126296732462008-08-31T06:20:00.000-07:002008-08-31T06:20:00.000-07:00Anon and Reason,Thanks for your comments. I was no...Anon and Reason,<BR/><BR/>Thanks for your comments. I was not aware of the HC order. The paper reported the terms of a settlement being negotiated amongst the parties yesterday. It appears to be quite a reasonable answer to the problem.cbcnn_Pilidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07404596183953851196noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32317349.post-77867175383699409222008-08-30T00:38:00.000-07:002008-08-30T00:38:00.000-07:00Pilid, Anon gave a link. Indian Express first rep...Pilid, <BR/>Anon gave a link. Indian Express first reported the solution steps from Arun Jaitley - the main thing was implementing the court order.<BR/><BR/>It is possible the Hindu never reported this. The low life editor has been barking like a mad dog from the beginning that it is the previous governor Sinha's fault.<BR/><BR/>A crucial step in the sequence of events is how the new governor vohra voluntarily returned the land and also ceded the responsibility of running the yatra to the state government. The state government could not have 'taken back' the land or 'taken control' of the yatra because that would be against the court order and contempt of court. It is very possible Governor Sinha was pressured by the secular rascals at the centre to do these, and he refused, and hence he is being hounded.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32317349.post-3933748941116781602008-08-30T00:06:00.000-07:002008-08-30T00:06:00.000-07:00Pilid,There was two court orders in 2005 allotting...Pilid,<BR/><BR/>There was two court orders in 2005 allotting the land to the shrine board. <A HREF="http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/PoliticsNation/Govt_wont_violate_court_rule_on_shrine/articleshow/3409550.cms" REL="nofollow">For example, see this news</A><BR/><BR/><I>Since the state government had refused to allocate any land to run the functions of the shrine board effectively, a writ petition was filed in the J&K high court. In its ruling delivered on April 15, 2005, a single-judge bench upheld the decision to transfer land to the shrine board.<BR/><BR/>The ruling was endorsed on May 17, 2005, by a division bench, which clarified in its interim order that ``the land to be allotted by the board would be only for the purposes of its user and would remain allotted for the duration of the yatra.<BR/></I>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32317349.post-11124074187268535732008-08-29T14:36:00.000-07:002008-08-29T14:36:00.000-07:00Anon,The distinction is duly noted.Anon,<BR/><BR/>The distinction is duly noted.cbcnn_Pilidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07404596183953851196noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32317349.post-84474556816753550522008-08-29T11:17:00.000-07:002008-08-29T11:17:00.000-07:00Praveen Swami is indeed thoughtful when he states ...Praveen Swami is indeed thoughtful when he states that a relic "reputed" to be a hair of Prophet Mohammad disappeared from Kashmir's Hazratbal shrine. We can note that the relic is not "alleged" (to be a hair of Prophet), an epithet uniquely reserved for "communal religions and their mythologies" in the high standards of journalism, as professed by Chindu. <BR/><BR/>Besides, Swami being Chindu's resident specialist on Kashmiri terrorism only knows too well the consequences of expressing the slightest doubt on the authenticiy or questioning the importance, of a shred of (human) hair.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32317349.post-87313178809070049292008-08-29T07:51:00.000-07:002008-08-29T07:51:00.000-07:00Reason,Which court order is this? Is there a link ...Reason,<BR/><BR/>Which court order is this? Is there a link to some item reporting this?<BR/><BR/>I was not aware that any court had directed transfer of land to the shrine board.cbcnn_Pilidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07404596183953851196noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32317349.post-41001753997039867672008-08-29T04:02:00.000-07:002008-08-29T04:02:00.000-07:00See the way LiC ends the sermon - "the United Prog...See the way LiC ends the sermon - <BR/>"the United Progressive Alliance regime seems to be moving towards a one-sided solution, which will be widely perceived to be at the expense of the people of Kashmir. If that happens, a bad situation could get horribly worse."<BR/><BR/>There are reports now even from congerss sources that the Court order regarding temporary land transfer for the duration of the Yatra to the shrine board will be honoured, and that will be the solution. This was the path first proposed reportedly by Arun Jaitley. The dailyexcelsior.com has been reporting for the last two days that this solution may be reached soon.<BR/><BR/>That is the problem for the secular communist Ram. He says following the court order will be at the expense of the people of Kashmir. And that is precisely what the separatists said too.<BR/><BR/>And you said something about 'a mob incited unexpectedly by an irrational fear of a seemingly innocuous fact. ' Look no further to know who is doing the inciting.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com